Emergency ban on puberty blockers ruled lawful

Politics

An emergency ban on puberty blockers introduced by the Conservative government was lawful, the High Court has ruled.

Campaign group TransActual, and a young person who cannot be named, had challenged then health secretary Victoria Atkins’s decision to impose “banning orders” on puberty blockers, which delay puberty by suppressing the natural production of sex hormones.

On Monday, Mrs Justice Lang dismissed the challenges, which had argued the ban on private prescriptions of the drugs to treat under 18s was unlawful.

The High Court in London heard at a hearing on 12 July that they should not have introduced an emergency ban because secondary legislation already prevents the prescription of puberty blockers from European or private prescribers, and restricts NHS provision within clinical trials.

But, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and the Department of Health in Northern Ireland defended the claim and said the case should be dismissed.

Mrs Justice Lang, dismissing the case, said: “This decision required a complex and multi-factored predictive assessment, involving the application of clinical judgment and the weighing of competing risks and dangers, with which the court should be slow to interfere.”

The emergency ban, effective between 3 June and 3 September, was implemented by the previous Conservative government as its final act on 30 May to “address risks to patient safety”.

More from Politics

They imposed the ban on the basis of the independent Cass Review into gender identity services for children and young people, which found there is “no good evidence on the long-term outcomes of interventions to manage gender-related distress”.

Before the ban, private clinics could prescribe puberty blockers despite them no longer being available on the NHS in England, unless children were participating in a research trial.

The High Court heard there are concerns the temporary ban could be made permanent by new Labour ministers.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was “treading cautiously” in his decision as there was “lots of fear and anxiety”.

He faced criticism from his own Labour colleagues for the decision, with Labour’s LGBT group saying earlier this month they had “concerns” about an indefinite ban.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive Breaking News alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News App. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Articles You May Like

Philippines VP says she will have president assassinated if she is killed
Reed wins in Hong Kong for 1st victory since ’21
Russia ready to hit UK with wave of cyber attacks, minister will warn
Elon Musk fires back on excluding Tesla from California’s new EV incentive he wants to kill
‘Money for nothing’ or low self-esteem – why are more young people on sickness benefit?